Browseable archive
The archive organizes suspect startup pages into an index of roast entries, making it easy to browse the collection rather than only seeing the homepage highlights.
shitfa.st
shitfa.st is an archive of landing pages that look generically AI-generated, with screenshots, ShitScore-style ratings, and short editorial roasts. It helps readers browse examples, inspect critiques, and submit suspicious sites for review.
Archive of AI-like startup landing pages
shitfa.st is a curated archive of landing pages that appear to follow the same generic AI-generated startup template. Its pages document suspect sites with screenshots, scorecards, category tags, and short editorial roasts that explain what looks repetitive or unconvincing.
The site is built around browsing and judging examples rather than selling a conventional software product. Visitors can open archive entries, inspect a ShitScore-style breakdown, submit a site for review, or score a page themselves. A pricing page exists, but it is written as satire and reinforces the site’s parody format rather than a normal checkout flow.
What shitfa.st offers
Scorecards and critiques
Each featured page is paired with a ShitScore and supporting notes that break down why the landing page reads as generic or AI-generated.
Pattern-based annotation
The site uses screenshots, tags, and editorial labels to document recurring patterns such as fake authority bars, waitlists, and overworked hero copy.
Submission and self-scoring
The homepage lets visitors move from browsing to participation by submitting a suspect site or scoring a page themselves.
Quick filters and categories
The site surfaces recurring categories and filters, including B2B sludge, SEO hustle, AI agents, and authority-logo hallucination, to help readers find similar examples.
Specific editorial notes
Individual roast pages include direct quotations and specific callouts, such as feature density, trust-signal suspicion, and ShipFast resemblance, rather than broad complaints.
When people use shitfa.st
Checking a homepage for generic tropes
Founders or marketers who want to compare a landing page against common AI-generated patterns can scan the archive for structural and copy cues.
Studying AI-style landing page patterns
People researching how AI-written startup pages tend to look can use the archive as a collection of annotated examples and critiques.
Submitting a suspect website
Visitors who notice a suspicious page in the wild can submit it for inclusion, turning a single example into part of the larger archive.
Reviewing one page in detail
Readers who want a quick assessment of a page’s presentation can open an individual roast entry to see the score and the editorial breakdown.
Pros and Cons
Pros
- Offers a clear archive structure for browsing examples instead of forcing users to hunt through isolated roasts.
- Uses screenshots, tags, scores, and notes together, which makes each entry more useful than a simple list of links.
- Highlights recurring patterns across sites, helping readers compare common AI-landing-page tropes.
- Includes participation features such as site submission and self-scoring.
Cons
- The source material does not show a conventional software workflow, so the site is more of an editorial archive than a tool with a defined operational use case.
- The pricing page is satirical, which makes the commercial model unclear from the visible copy alone.
FAQ
What is shitfa.st?
The archive is presented as a hand-curated collection of landing pages that read like they were written by one AI. Entries include screenshots, tags, scores, and editorial notes.
How does the site work?
The site combines a public archive with individual roast pages and scorecards. The homepage also invites visitors to browse the archive, submit a suspect site, or score a page themselves.
What kind of output does it provide?
The archive entries show the site content, screenshots, tags, and a ShitScore-style critique. The homepage also surfaces filter labels such as B2B sludge, SEO hustle, AI agents, authority logo hallucination, and waitlist as product.
Is there a real paid plan or trial?
The pricing page is satirical and framed as a product that does not actually exist, with calls to start a free trial, book a demo, or join a waitlist. Based on the page text, those CTAs are part of the joke rather than a clear, functional commercial plan.
Quick Facts
- Category
- Editorial archive / website critique
- Primary format
- Archive entries with screenshots, tags, ShitScore-style ratings, and roast notes
- Main action
- Browse entries, submit a suspect site, or score a page
- Source domain
- shitfa.st
- Pricing signal
- Satirical pricing page with demo, trial, and waitlist language
Alternativas a shitfa.st
MacSpoof
MacSpoof es un cambiador de MAC para macOS: cambia o aleatoriza tu MAC Wi‑Fi para reconectar y reducir el registro de identidad en redes públicas.
NomNak
NomNak es una app gratuita para iPhone para descubrir restaurantes con recomendaciones de amigos, guardar lugares, crear tu pasaporte gastronómico y buscar ciudades.
Ctrl+Shift+3
Ctrl+Shift+3 is a calm, text-first community platform with a chronological feed, profiles, RSS, and private groups called Clicks. It is built for reading, posting, and joining smaller communities without algorithmic ranking or vanity counts.
TyeGit
TyeGit es un cliente Git nativo para desarrolladores que buscan control rápido y preciso de staging, commits, ramas y remotos en Windows, macOS y Linux.
Servey
Servey lets you mirror and control a Mac from an iPhone or iPad, with a real terminal and automatic local-or-remote connectivity. It is aimed at people who want full Mac access on mobile without VPN or port forwarding.
Terminal Candy
Terminal Candy is a native macOS terminal app that lets you run a real shell inside custom visual skins. It supports community skins, custom skin creation from images, and a one-time license after a free trial.