FreezeRadar

What is FreezeRadar?

FreezeRadar is a wallet risk screening platform focused on assets that can be frozen. It scans counterparty wallets in real time across multiple blockchain networks to flag sanctions exposure, risky counterparties, and freeze-risk signals before you accept funds.

The platform is built for people and teams that need to screen incoming transfers as part of a compliance workflow, including due diligence on direct and indirect counterparties.

Key Features

• Multi-chain wallet screening (Ethereum, Tron, BNB Smart Chain, Polygon, Solana): produces a unified risk profile across supported networks.
• Real-time counterparty scans with category-based flags: addresses are highlighted so users can decide before funds arrive.
• Sanctions list cross-referencing (OFAC, EU, UN consolidated lists): checks wallet exposure against designated-entity information in real time.
• 1-hop and 2-hop exposure analysis: maps relationships two hops deep to reveal indirect exposure to sanctioned entities, mixers, and illicit services.
• Freezeable asset sensitivity coverage: flags elevated freeze-risk for issuer-controlled assets called out on the site (e.g., USDT, USDC, PAXG, and XAUt).
• Evidence-backed risk scoring with explainable output: scores include direct hits, exposure findings, label categories, and confidence metrics rather than a black-box verdict.
• Watchlists with monitoring and alerting: enables tracking and instant alerts when a monitored wallet’s risk profile changes; monitoring is described as 24/7.
• Team collaboration and API access: supports shared watchlists and risk reports, with direct integration available via REST API.
• Performance-oriented scanning for cached addresses: results are described as under 2 seconds for cached addresses, while fresh on-chain data is fetched and scored automatically.

How to Use FreezeRadar

1. Start a wallet screen for a counterparty address you’re considering receiving funds from.
2. Review the risk results, including sanctions exposure, exposure findings, label categories, and the confidence metrics behind the risk score.
3. If you need ongoing monitoring, add the wallet to a watchlist and use the alerting/dashboard view to track material risk changes over time.
4. For automated workflows, integrate with FreezeRadar using the provided REST API so incoming transfers can be screened without manual rescans.

Use Cases

• Screening a counterparty before processing a transfer: scan the incoming wallet to determine whether it shows sanctions exposure, risky counterparty indicators, or freeze-risk signals.
• Due diligence using 2-hop exposure analysis: assess indirect connections two steps away to understand exposure to sanctioned entities, mixers, or illicit services that may not be obvious from the direct wallet.
• Monitoring a list of counterparties over time: create watchlists for frequently used wallets and receive instant alerts when their risk category changes.
• Compliance checks for issuer-controlled freezeable assets: evaluate freeze-risk signals for tokens identified on the site (including USDT, USDC, PAXG, and XAUt) as part of an asset acceptance workflow.
• Automating screening in a payment flow: use the REST API to screen every incoming USDC transfer automatically, reducing manual overhead.

FAQ

• Which networks does FreezeRadar support? FreezeRadar supports Ethereum, Tron, BNB Smart Chain, Polygon, and Solana.

• What does FreezeRadar screen for? It screens wallets for sanctions exposure, risky counterparties, and freezeable asset sensitivity, including issuer-controlled freeze-risk signals mentioned on the site.

• What is 1-hop vs 2-hop exposure analysis? The site describes direct (1-hop) checking and mapping relationships two hops deep (2-hop) to reveal indirect exposure to sanctioned entities, mixers, and illicit services.

• Does FreezeRadar provide explainable results? Yes. The platform described “evidence-backed” scoring, including direct hits, exposure findings, label categories, and confidence metrics.

• How can teams use FreezeRadar? The site mentions watchlists, instant alerts, collaboration/sharing of risk reports, and REST API access for workflow integration.

Alternatives

• On-chain analytics and address labeling services: can provide some exposure and label context, but may not offer the same freezeable-asset sensitivity focus and evidence-backed risk scoring described for FreezeRadar.
• Sanctions screening tools focused on entity lists: can help with OFAC/EU/UN list checks, but may not include the 1-hop/2-hop counterparty relationship analysis or freeze-risk signals for issuer-controlled tokens.
• Manual compliance review workflows (e.g., internal risk teams plus spreadsheets): may replicate parts of screening and monitoring, but typically lacks real-time scanning, automated watchlist alerts, and API-driven integration.
• General blockchain monitoring platforms: useful for tracking on-chain activity, but may not specifically target wallet freeze-risk and explainable sanctions/exposure scoring as laid out on FreezeRadar’s site.